Ashworth, R v
The notional determinate sentence of 4 years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the short duration of the detention, modest degree of violence, absence of weapons, and the appellant's early guilty plea. The sentence of imprisonment for public protection was quashed and substituted with a determinate sentence of 2 years' imprisonment.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: William Lees Ashworth
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; sentence of imprisonment for public protection quashed; determinate sentence substituted
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerousness Assessment, Imprisonment for Public Protection, False Imprisonment, Criminal Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
William Lees Ashworth
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant posed a significant risk to the public of serious harm by committing further specified offences under section 229(2) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether a notional determinate sentence of 4 years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive for the offence of false imprisonment
Ratio Decidendi
The notional determinate sentence of 4 years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the short duration of the detention, modest degree of violence, absence of weapons, and the appellant's early guilty plea. The sentence of imprisonment for public protection was quashed and substituted with a determinate sentence of 2 years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; sentence of imprisonment for public protection quashed; determinate sentence substituted
Orders
- Sentence of imprisonment for public protection quashed
- Substitute sentence of 2 years' imprisonment on count 1 (false imprisonment)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment