Kean v McDonald & Ors [2006] EWHC 698 (Ch) (23 March 2006)
The court accepted the oral evidence of Mr. Kean and Mr. McDonald, finding that a common intention constructive trust was established in 1997, supported by the £10,000 payment and detrimental reliance, and rejected alternative ownership claims by Stableclock Ltd and Mr. Gerrard.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 698 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Robert Alan Kean; Defendant: William McDonald; Defendant: Ashley Sansom; Defendant: Robert Wilson; Defendant: Robert Stephen Gerrard; Defendant: Crown Prosecution Service; Defendant: H. M. Attorney General to the Duchy of Lancaster
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Chancery Division Civil Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; Mr. Kean declared sole beneficial owner of the property.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Trust, Beneficial Ownership, Transfer of Property, Detrimental Reliance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Alan Kean
Claimant
William McDonald
Defendant
Ashley Sansom
Defendant
Robert Wilson
Defendant
Robert Stephen Gerrard
Defendant
Crown Prosecution Service
Defendant
H. M. Attorney General to the Duchy of Lancaster
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Chancery Division Civil Claim / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is the beneficial owner of the property at 1B Charnley's Lane, Banks, Merseyside
- 2 Whether a constructive trust based on common intention exists
- 3 Whether the £10,000 payment constituted detrimental reliance
Ratio Decidendi
The court accepted the oral evidence of Mr. Kean and Mr. McDonald, finding that a common intention constructive trust was established in 1997, supported by the £10,000 payment and detrimental reliance, and rejected alternative ownership claims by Stableclock Ltd and Mr. Gerrard.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; Mr. Kean declared sole beneficial owner of the property.
Orders
- Parties to agree the appropriate form of Order reflecting Mr. Kean's beneficial ownership; costs to be argued separately.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment