Wagstaff v Murison [2023] EWHC 2976 (KB) (08 November 2023)
The court approved the settlement as being in the best interests of the protected party, finding the structure of lump sum and periodical payments appropriate to meet the claimant's needs, and that the settlement was reasonable in light of the evidence and risks.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 2976 (KB)
- Parties
- Claimant: James William Wagstaff; Litigation Friend: Catherine Carr; Defendant: William Murison
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Settlement Approval Hearing for Protected Party
- Outcome
- Settlement approved
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Settlement Approval, Protected Parties, Mental Capacity, Periodical Payments
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James William Wagstaff
Claimant
Catherine Carr
Litigation Friend
William Murison
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Settlement Approval Hearing for Protected Party
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed settlement of damages for a protected party should be approved by the court
- 2 Whether the structure of the settlement (lump sum and periodical payments) is appropriate for the claimant's needs
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the settlement as being in the best interests of the protected party, finding the structure of lump sum and periodical payments appropriate to meet the claimant's needs, and that the settlement was reasonable in light of the evidence and risks.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved
Orders
- Settlement of £1,170,000 net lump sum and £16,000 per annum periodical payments approved under CPR 21.10
- Payment out of damages of £2,632 for After the Event insurance premium approved under CPR 46.4(2)(b)(ii) and 46.4(3)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment