James William Wagstaff v William Murison

James William Wagstaff v William Murison

The court found that the proposed settlement, comprising a lump sum and periodical payments, was in the best interests of the protected party, Mr Wagstaff, and approved the settlement under CPR 21.10.

Parties
Claimant: James William Wagstaff; Litigation Friend: Catherine Carr; Defendant: William Murison
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Approval of Settlement for Protected Party
Outcome
settlement approved
Legal Topics
Personal Injury, Damages, Protected Parties, Court Approval of Settlements
Tort Civil Procedure Personal Injury Damages Protected Parties Court Approval of Settlements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

James William Wagstaff

Claimant

Catherine Carr

Litigation Friend

William Murison

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury / Approval of Settlement for Protected Party

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed settlement of damages for a protected party should be approved by the court under CPR 21.10
  2. 2 Whether the structure of the settlement, including periodical payments, is appropriate and in the claimant's best interests

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the proposed settlement, comprising a lump sum and periodical payments, was in the best interests of the protected party, Mr Wagstaff, and approved the settlement under CPR 21.10.

Court Disposition

settlement approved

Orders

  • Settlement of £320,000 gross lump sum and £45,000 per annum periodical payments approved under CPR 21.10
  • Payment out of £2,632 for After the Event insurance premium approved under CPR 46.4