The Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills v Warry [2014] EWHC 1381 (Ch) (24 February 2014)
Mr Warry's conduct as director involved gross negligence in failing to carry out proper due diligence against a known background of rampant VAT fraud, making him unfit to be concerned in the management of a company under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1381 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills; Defendant: William Nicolas Warry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Director's Disqualification Application / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Director disqualified under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 for gross negligence.
- Legal Topics
- Director's Disqualification, MTIC VAT Fraud, Due Diligence, Unfitness to Manage Company
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills
Claimant
William Nicolas Warry
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Director's Disqualification Application / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Warry knew or should have known that Chapter 6 participated in transactions connected with fraudulent evasion of VAT
- 2 Whether Mr Warry allowed Chapter 6 to participate in such transactions
- 3 Whether Mr Warry caused or allowed Chapter 6 to make wrongful claims for input tax recovery
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Warry's conduct as director involved gross negligence in failing to carry out proper due diligence against a known background of rampant VAT fraud, making him unfit to be concerned in the management of a company under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.
Court Disposition
Director disqualified under section 6 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 for gross negligence.
Orders
- Disqualification order against Mr Warry for a period to be determined (minimum 11 years indicated for MTIC fraud cases).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment