Wilsdon, R (on the application of) v First Secretary of State & Anor
The Inspector was entitled to consider the building's size, permanence, construction, and the credibility of the appellant's intention to remove it. The Inspector lawfully concluded that the building was not genuinely required temporarily in connection with the development, and thus did not fall within Class A, Part 4 of Schedule 2 to the GPDO. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Wilsdon; First Respondent: First Secretary of State; Second Respondent: Tewkesbury Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Statutory Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement Notice Appeal, Permitted Development, Temporary Buildings, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wilsdon
Appellant
First Secretary of State
First Respondent
Tewkesbury Borough Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Statutory Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the building erected by the appellant was 'required temporarily' within the meaning of Class A, Part 4, Schedule 2 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (GPDO)
- 2 Whether the Inspector erred in law in dismissing the ground (c) appeal against the enforcement notice
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector was entitled to consider the building's size, permanence, construction, and the credibility of the appellant's intention to remove it. The Inspector lawfully concluded that the building was not genuinely required temporarily in connection with the development, and thus did not fall within Class A, Part 4 of Schedule 2 to the GPDO. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Appellant to pay the first respondent's costs, summarily assessed at £5,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment