Freedman, R (On the Application Of) v Wiltshire Council
The Defendant erred by failing to consider whether, on a balance of probabilities, the land had been used for vehicular parking (not just ancillary parking) for a continuous period of 10 years or more, and by aggregating periods of different uses. The certificate of lawful use must be quashed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cyril Freedman; Defendant: Wiltshire Council; Interested Party: Peter Crocker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim for judicial review allowed; certificate of lawful use quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Lawfulness, Material Change of Use, Section 191 Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Judicial Review Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cyril Freedman
Claimant
Wiltshire Council
Defendant
Peter Crocker
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the local planning authority can substitute a different use description under section 191(4) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- 2 Whether the authority erred by aggregating periods of different uses to establish 10 years continuous use for vehicular parking
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant erred by failing to consider whether, on a balance of probabilities, the land had been used for vehicular parking (not just ancillary parking) for a continuous period of 10 years or more, and by aggregating periods of different uses. The certificate of lawful use must be quashed.
Court Disposition
Claim for judicial review allowed; certificate of lawful use quashed.
Orders
- The certificate of lawful use granted on 30 July 2013 is quashed.
- The Defendant must reconsider the application in accordance with the correct legal approach.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment