Zurich Assurance Ltd v Winchester City Council & Anor
The Inspector's assessment of housing requirements was lawful and rational, the duty to co-operate was fulfilled, and the Sustainability Appraisal met statutory requirements. Zurich Assurance Limited had standing as a person aggrieved, but all grounds of challenge failed on the merits and adequacy of reasons.
- Parties
- Claimant: Zurich Assurance Limited; Defendant: Winchester City Council; Defendant: South Downs National Park Authority
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Local Development Plans, Duty to Co Operate, Strategic Environmental Assessment, Housing Provision, Standing (person Aggrieved)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zurich Assurance Limited
Claimant
Winchester City Council
Defendant
South Downs National Park Authority
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector made a methodological error in assessing housing requirements
- 2 Whether Winchester City Council complied with the duty to co-operate under section 33A
- 3 Whether the Sustainability Appraisal complied with the SEA Directive and Environmental Assessment Regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector's assessment of housing requirements was lawful and rational, the duty to co-operate was fulfilled, and the Sustainability Appraisal met statutory requirements. Zurich Assurance Limited had standing as a person aggrieved, but all grounds of challenge failed on the merits and adequacy of reasons.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment