Wellesley Partners Llp v Withers Llp
Withers LLP was negligent in drafting clause 25.2 of the LLP agreement without instructions from the client, resulting in Addax being able to withdraw capital earlier than intended. Withers was not negligent in the other respects alleged, including advice on currency risk and redistribution of Addax's interest. WP was not contributorily negligent as it was reasonable for Mr Channing to rely on the solicitors and not review every draft in detail. Damages are recoverable for loss of profits in the US and London, and for diversion of management time, subject to assessment of legal costs.
- Parties
- Claimant: Wellesley Partners LLP; Defendant: Withers LLP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Professional Negligence / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part; judgment for the claimant on primary negligence issue; other allegations dismissed; damages awarded.
- Legal Topics
- Solicitors' Duties, Contributory Negligence, Damages, Remoteness of Damage, Loss of Profits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wellesley Partners LLP
Claimant
Withers LLP
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Professional Negligence / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Withers LLP was negligent in drafting clause 25.2 of the LLP agreement without instructions from the client.
- 2 Whether Withers LLP was negligent in failing to advise on the currency risk and capital contribution in US dollars.
- 3 Whether Withers LLP was negligent in failing to provide for redistribution of Addax's interest upon exercise of the option.
Ratio Decidendi
Withers LLP was negligent in drafting clause 25.2 of the LLP agreement without instructions from the client, resulting in Addax being able to withdraw capital earlier than intended. Withers was not negligent in the other respects alleged, including advice on currency risk and redistribution of Addax's interest. WP was not contributorily negligent as it was reasonable for Mr Channing to rely on the solicitors and not review every draft in detail. Damages are recoverable for loss of profits in the US and London, and for diversion of management time, subject to assessment of legal costs.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part; judgment for the claimant on primary negligence issue; other allegations dismissed; damages awarded.
Orders
- Damages awarded to Wellesley Partners LLP in the sum of £1,612,313, subject to assessment of interest and legal costs.
- Legal costs attributable to the misdrafting of clause 25.2 to be assessed by a costs judge if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment