Witnesham Ventures Ltd v Markwick & Ors [2008] EWLands LRX_19_2007 (24 April 2008)
The LVT's decision was quashed in part because it failed to provide adequate reasons or findings of fact for disallowing certain service charge items, making it impossible for the parties to understand the basis of the decision. The disputes could only be justly determined by findings of fact, necessitating a rehearing before a differently constituted LVT.
- Citation
- [2008] EWLands LRX_19_2007
- Parties
- Appellant: Witnesham Ventures Limited; First Respondent: Mrs Frances Markwick; Second Respondent: Devonian Court Residents Association
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Leasehold Valuation Tribunal Decision / Appeal Judgment and Remittal Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; LVT decision quashed in respect of disallowed service charge items and section 20C order; matter remitted for rehearing before differently constituted LVT.
- Legal Topics
- Service Charges, Leasehold Disputes, Section 27 a Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, Section 20 C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, Tribunal Procedure, Findings of Fact, Adequacy of Reasons
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Witnesham Ventures Limited
Appellant
Mrs Frances Markwick
First Respondent
Devonian Court Residents Association
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Leasehold Valuation Tribunal Decision / Appeal Judgment and Remittal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT) gave adequate reasons and findings of fact for disallowing certain service charge items
- 2 Whether the Lands Tribunal should itself determine the disputed items or remit for rehearing
- 3 Appropriate handling of costs under section 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
Ratio Decidendi
The LVT's decision was quashed in part because it failed to provide adequate reasons or findings of fact for disallowing certain service charge items, making it impossible for the parties to understand the basis of the decision. The disputes could only be justly determined by findings of fact, necessitating a rehearing before a differently constituted LVT.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; LVT decision quashed in respect of disallowed service charge items and section 20C order; matter remitted for rehearing before differently constituted LVT.
Orders
- LVT's decision disallowing service charge items totalling £155,337.86 quashed
- Question of recoverability of these items remitted for fresh hearing before differently constituted LVT
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment