WM v HM
The court held that a linear time apportionment is the fairest method to determine the non-matrimonial value of the business at the start of the relationship, resulting in £44,490,350 as non-matrimonial and £176,634,650 as matrimonial. The husband's contributions, while significant, did not meet the threshold for special contribution. The marital assets, net of taxes and costs, should be divided equally, with the wife receiving a combination of property, cash, and an increased shareholding in the business, part of which is deferred to allow the husband to continue operating the business.
- Parties
- Applicant: WM; Respondent: HM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Divorce Financial Remedy / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Decree for equal division of marital assets; no special contribution found; clean break upon payment.
- Legal Topics
- Division of Matrimonial Assets, Non Matrimonial Property, Special Contribution, Clean Break, Valuation of Business Assets, Deferred Lump Sum Payments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
WM
Applicant
HM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Divorce Financial Remedy / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 How should the value of a business founded before marriage be apportioned between matrimonial and non-matrimonial property?
- 2 Does the husband's contribution justify a departure from equality (special contribution)?
- 3 What is the fair method for division and payment of assets, including deferred payments and share transfers?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that a linear time apportionment is the fairest method to determine the non-matrimonial value of the business at the start of the relationship, resulting in £44,490,350 as non-matrimonial and £176,634,650 as matrimonial. The husband's contributions, while significant, did not meet the threshold for special contribution. The marital assets, net of taxes and costs, should be divided equally, with the wife receiving a combination of property, cash, and an increased shareholding in the business, part of which is deferred to allow the husband to continue operating the business.
Court Disposition
Decree for equal division of marital assets; no special contribution found; clean break upon payment.
Orders
- Wife to receive Hampshire House, Kings Rd, Teignmouth, specified bank accounts, £184,000 pension, and £40 million from declared dividend (with £20 million deferred for up to two years, secured by charge over husband's shares).
- Wife's shareholding in XG to increase from 1% to 17.5% upon full payment of deferred lump sum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment