Wholecrop Marketing Ltd v Wolds Produce Ltd
The parties intended that all disputes be settled by arbitration within 12 months, and failure to commence arbitration within that period time-barred the claim entirely, not just the remedy of arbitration. The contract and incorporated Arbitration Rules make this clear.
- Parties
- Claimant: Wholecrop Marketing Limited; Defendant: Wolds Produce Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; claim time-barred.
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Clauses, Time Bar, Contractual Interpretation, Estoppel, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wholecrop Marketing Limited
Claimant
Wolds Produce Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Condition 18 of the BPTA Terms & Conditions and Rule 1 of the Arbitration Rules time-barred the cause of action or merely the remedy of arbitration
- 2 Whether the parties' rights to bring court proceedings survived expiry of the arbitration time limit
- 3 Whether Wolds was estopped or had waived reliance on the time bar
Ratio Decidendi
The parties intended that all disputes be settled by arbitration within 12 months, and failure to commence arbitration within that period time-barred the claim entirely, not just the remedy of arbitration. The contract and incorporated Arbitration Rules make this clear.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; claim time-barred.
Orders
- Wholecrop to pay Wolds’ costs of the appeal and hearing below, subject to detailed assessment in default of agreement.
- Interim payment of £9000 by 4.00pm 12 August 2013.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment