NEHA BERIWALA v WOODSTONE PROPERTIES (BIRMINGHAM) LIMITED & Anor

NEHA BERIWALA v WOODSTONE PROPERTIES (BIRMINGHAM) LIMITED & Anor

The factors in favour of not handing down the judgment, including the parties' wishes, the private nature of the dispute, absence of public interest, and the public interest in avoiding further litigation and court resource expenditure, outweigh the limited public interest in handing down the judgment.

Parties
Claimant: Neha Beriwala; Defendant: Woodstone Properties (Birmingham) Limited; Defendant: Joga Khangure
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Commercial Dispute / Post Trial, Settlement Reached Before Judgment Hand Down
Outcome
Judgment not handed down; Tomlin order approved.
Legal Topics
Judgment Hand Down Discretion, Settlement, Public Interest, Court Resources

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Neha Beriwala

Claimant

Woodstone Properties (Birmingham) Limited

Defendant

Joga Khangure

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Dispute / Post Trial, Settlement Reached Before Judgment Hand Down

  1. 1 Should the court hand down a judgment after parties have settled and requested it not be handed down?
  2. 2 What factors should be considered in deciding whether to hand down judgment against parties' wishes?

Ratio Decidendi

The factors in favour of not handing down the judgment, including the parties' wishes, the private nature of the dispute, absence of public interest, and the public interest in avoiding further litigation and court resource expenditure, outweigh the limited public interest in handing down the judgment.

Court Disposition

Judgment not handed down; Tomlin order approved.

Orders

  • Original judgment not handed down.
  • Updated Tomlin order approved as settlement.