D, R (On the Application Of) v Worcestershire County Council
The consultation process was not materially defective; consultees were provided with sufficient information about the policy's consequences, and the Council's response to criticisms was adequate. The Council had due regard to its public sector equality duty, with a proper Equality Impact Assessment and sufficient information before the Cabinet. The claim fails on both grounds.
- Parties
- Claimant: THE QUEEN on the application of D; Defendant: WORCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Consultation Requirements, Public Sector Equality Duty, Adult Social Care Policy, Disability Rights, Local Authority Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
THE QUEEN on the application of D
Claimant
WORCESTERSHIRE COUNTY COUNCIL
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council's consultation process for adopting the adult social care policy was materially defective and unlawful
- 2 Whether the Council failed to comply with its public sector equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 in adopting the policy
Ratio Decidendi
The consultation process was not materially defective; consultees were provided with sufficient information about the policy's consequences, and the Council's response to criticisms was adequate. The Council had due regard to its public sector equality duty, with a proper Equality Impact Assessment and sufficient information before the Cabinet. The claim fails on both grounds.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment