DG & Ors R (on the application of) v Worcestershire County Council [2005] EWHC 2332 (Admin) (11 October 2005)
Although claimants had a reasonable case and proceedings were properly instituted, it was not clear they would have succeeded; therefore, no order for costs is appropriate.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 2332 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: DG, MM, WG, SM, CG; Defendant: Worcestershire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Post Consent Order, Costs Determination
- Outcome
- Proceedings withdrawn by consent; no order for costs save legal aid assessment.
- Legal Topics
- Local Authority Duties, Care Funding, Supported Living, Judicial Review Procedure, Costs in Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
DG, MM, WG, SM, CG
Claimant
Worcestershire County Council
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Post Consent Order, Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Worcestershire County Council lawfully approved withdrawal of care funding for claimants with learning difficulties
- 2 Whether proper consultation and assessment of claimants' needs occurred before funding withdrawal
- 3 Whether claimants were entitled to remain in their accommodation with Marpool Limited
Ratio Decidendi
Although claimants had a reasonable case and proceedings were properly instituted, it was not clear they would have succeeded; therefore, no order for costs is appropriate.
Court Disposition
Proceedings withdrawn by consent; no order for costs save legal aid assessment.
Orders
- Worcestershire County Council to complete community care assessments and serve on claimants by 1 December 2005.
- Care plans to be completed; Council to fund Marpool and provide services until November 2005; Council to take over funding until 31 March 2006.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment