The Financial Conduct Authority v McKendrick
Mr McKendrick admitted and the court found, to the criminal standard, that he committed five deliberate breaches of clear and properly served worldwide freezing orders. The contempts were serious, planned, and intended to thwart the court’s orders. Mitigation included his admissions, apology, and belated attempt to comply, but the seriousness of the contempts required an immediate custodial sentence.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: The Financial Conduct Authority; Tenth Defendant/respondent: Robert John McKendrick
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Committal Application (contempt of Court) / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Mr McKendrick committed for contempt of court to six months' immediate imprisonment.
- Legal Topics
- Worldwide Freezing Orders, Asset Disclosure, Breach of Court Orders, Sentencing for Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Financial Conduct Authority
Claimant/applicant
Robert John McKendrick
Tenth Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Committal Application (contempt of Court) / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr McKendrick breached the Roth and McCahill Worldwide Freezing Orders
- 2 Whether the breaches amount to contempt of court
- 3 What penalty is appropriate for the contempts
Ratio Decidendi
Mr McKendrick admitted and the court found, to the criminal standard, that he committed five deliberate breaches of clear and properly served worldwide freezing orders. The contempts were serious, planned, and intended to thwart the court’s orders. Mitigation included his admissions, apology, and belated attempt to comply, but the seriousness of the contempts required an immediate custodial sentence.
Court Disposition
Mr McKendrick committed for contempt of court to six months' immediate imprisonment.
Orders
- Mr McKendrick is committed to prison for six months from the date of apprehension.
- He is entitled to unconditional release after serving half the sentence under section 258 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment