Sony / ATV Music Publishing LLC & Anor v WPMC Ltd & Anor
Mr Bailey was the real party to the litigation from 4 January 2013, controlled and partly funded WPMC's defence for his own benefit, and WPMC was insolvent throughout. It is just to require Mr Bailey to pay SATV's costs from that date.
- Parties
- Claimant: SONY/ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC; Claimant: SONY/ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING (UK) LIMITED; Defendant: WPMC LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION); Defendant: IAMBIC MEDIA LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION); Costs Defendant: David Bailey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Application After Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Non Party Costs Orders, Corporate Control and Liability, Costs Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SONY/ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING LLC
Claimant
SONY/ATV MUSIC PUBLISHING (UK) LIMITED
Claimant
WPMC LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Defendant
IAMBIC MEDIA LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)
Defendant
David Bailey
Costs Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Application After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a non-party costs order should be made against David Bailey under section 51(3) of the Senior Courts Act 1981
- 2 Whether Mr Bailey was the real party to the litigation and controlled/funded the defence for his own benefit
- 3 Whether it is just in all the circumstances to make a non-party costs order
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Bailey was the real party to the litigation from 4 January 2013, controlled and partly funded WPMC's defence for his own benefit, and WPMC was insolvent throughout. It is just to require Mr Bailey to pay SATV's costs from that date.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- David Bailey to pay SATV's costs from 4 January 2013
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment