WX v HX

WX v HX

Given the respondent's failure to provide full and frank disclosure and the fragility of the business valuation evidence, the fairest outcome is for the applicant to receive the family home and retain her own capital and pension assets, with the respondent retaining his shareholding. No lump sum is awarded. The...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: WX; Respondent: HX; Intervenor: MX; Intervenor: SX; Intervenor: BX
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy on Divorce / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application for property adjustment order granted; lump sum refused; costs order made against respondent.
Legal Topics
Financial Remedies, Non Disclosure, Costs, Property Adjustment, Clean Break, Business Valuation
Family Law Financial Remedies Non Disclosure Costs Property Adjustment Clean Break Business Valuation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 47 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 21
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WX

Applicant

HX

Respondent

MX

Intervenor

SX

Intervenor

BX

Intervenor

Procedural Posture

Financial Remedy on Divorce / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Appropriate division of matrimonial assets including family home and shareholding in a family company
  2. 2 Impact of non-disclosure on asset division
  3. 3 Treatment of liabilities and costs incurred during proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

Given the respondent's failure to provide full and frank disclosure and the fragility of the business valuation evidence, the fairest outcome is for the applicant to receive the family home and retain her own capital and pension assets, with the respondent retaining his shareholding. No lump sum is awarded. The respondent's litigation conduct justifies a substantial costs order against him.

Court Disposition

Application for property adjustment order granted; lump sum refused; costs order made against respondent.

Orders

  • Transfer of the family home to the applicant, with 18 months to secure respondent's release from the mortgage, failing which the property is to be sold and net proceeds paid to the applicant.
  • Clean break as to capital and income between applicant and respondent.