Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
The Council acted lawfully and within its statutory discretion in excluding the RAF Daws Hill and Handy Cross Sports Centre sites from the designated Neighbourhood Area. The Council properly considered the appropriateness of the area in light of the strategic nature of the sites, the advanced stage of planning, and...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum; Claimant: Stuart Armstrong; Claimant: Angus Laidlaw; Defendant: Wycombe District Council; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Interested Party: Taylor Wimpey UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Neighbourhood Planning, Localism Act 2011, Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Neighbourhood Forum Designation, Neighbourhood Area Designation, Judicial Review of Local Authority Decisions
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum
Claimant
Stuart Armstrong
Claimant
Angus Laidlaw
Claimant
Wycombe District Council
Defendant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
Interested Party
Taylor Wimpey UK Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council acted lawfully in excluding two strategic sites from the designated Neighbourhood Area for the Daws Hill Neighbourhood Forum
- 2 Whether the Council failed to take into account relevant considerations or acted irrationally or contrary to statutory purpose under the Localism Act 2011
Ratio Decidendi
The Council acted lawfully and within its statutory discretion in excluding the RAF Daws Hill and Handy Cross Sports Centre sites from the designated Neighbourhood Area. The Council properly considered the appropriateness of the area in light of the strategic nature of the sites, the advanced stage of planning, and the likely ineffectiveness of a neighbourhood plan. None of the grounds of challenge were made out.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment