X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau & Anor
The court held that the issue of whether the appellant's voluntary role constituted 'occupation' under the Directive was arguable and should be remitted to the Employment Appeal Tribunal for consideration alongside other issues, setting aside the previous order that the issue was not arguable.
- Parties
- Appellant: X; Respondents: Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Volunteer Rights, Interpretation of Statutes, Direct Effect of EU Directives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
X
Appellant
Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau & Anr
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether volunteer workers are excluded from the protection of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the appellant's role constituted 'occupation' under Council Directive 2000/78/EC
- 3 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in its interpretation of 'work placement' and 'occupation'
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the issue of whether the appellant's voluntary role constituted 'occupation' under the Directive was arguable and should be remitted to the Employment Appeal Tribunal for consideration alongside other issues, setting aside the previous order that the issue was not arguable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Employment Appeal Tribunal refusing permission on the 'occupation' ground set aside
- Matter remitted to the Employment Appeal Tribunal for consideration of the occupation issue and related matters
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment