A Lloyd's Syndicate v X
The Defendant's engagement was limited to providing his view on the Interlocking Clause, and the scope of confidential or privileged information imparted was not extensive. There is no evidence that the Defendant has misused such information, nor is it likely he will do so given the passage of time and lack of detailed recollection. The less stringent test for expert witnesses applies, and the arbitration tribunal has permitted the Defendant to give evidence. The application for injunction is therefore dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: A Lloyd’s Syndicate; Defendant: X
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Injunction / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Witness Conflict, Confidentiality, Privilege, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Lloyd’s Syndicate
Claimant
X
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunction / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an expert previously engaged by a party can act for the opposing party in a related arbitration involving the same issue
- 2 Whether confidential or privileged information was imparted to the expert and whether its misuse is likely
- 3 Whether the test for injunction is the risk or inevitability of misuse of privileged information
Ratio Decidendi
The Defendant's engagement was limited to providing his view on the Interlocking Clause, and the scope of confidential or privileged information imparted was not extensive. There is no evidence that the Defendant has misused such information, nor is it likely he will do so given the passage of time and lack of detailed recollection. The less stringent test for expert witnesses applies, and the arbitration tribunal has permitted the Defendant to give evidence. The application for injunction is therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment