X (Local Authority) v A Mother & Father [2010] EWCC 4 (Fam) (2010)
The threshold criteria under section 31 Children Act 1989 are met; M was at risk of significant harm. A care order is necessary and proportionate to ensure M's welfare and to implement the care plan, which is the least interventionist option available.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCC 4 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: X Local Authority; 1st Respondent: A Mother (DK); 2nd Respondent: A Father (MW); Grandmother: Mrs. F (Grandmother); Guardian: Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Final Judgment on Application for Care Order
- Outcome
- Care order granted in respect of M.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Parental Responsibility, Threshold Criteria, Welfare of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
X Local Authority
Applicant
A Mother (DK)
1st Respondent
A Father (MW)
2nd Respondent
Mrs. F (Grandmother)
Grandmother
Guardian
Guardian
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Final Judgment on Application for Care Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the threshold criteria under section 31 Children Act 1989 are met
- 2 Whether a care order is necessary and proportionate for M's welfare
Ratio Decidendi
The threshold criteria under section 31 Children Act 1989 are met; M was at risk of significant harm. A care order is necessary and proportionate to ensure M's welfare and to implement the care plan, which is the least interventionist option available.
Court Disposition
Care order granted in respect of M.
Orders
- Care order made based on the current care plan.
- Local authority granted parental responsibility for M.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment