B and A (Children), Re [2010] EWMC 11 (FPC)(2010)

B and A (Children), Re [2010] EWMC 11 (FPC)(2010)

The court found that the threshold criteria for care orders were met due to the children suffering or being at risk of significant harm from exposure to domestic violence, neglect, and the mother's inability to protect them or work openly with professionals. The court determined that the mother could not safely...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] EWMC 11
Parties
Applicant: X Local Authority; 1st Respondent (mother): Ms W; 2nd Respondent (child): B (child); 2nd Respondent (child): A (child); Children’s Guardian: Mrs G; Father of B (party, Not Present): Mr M; Father of a (party, Not Present): Mr A
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Care and Placement Order Application (family Proceedings) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Outcome
Care orders and placement orders made in respect of B and A; mother's consent to placement dispensed with.
Legal Topics
Care Orders, Placement Orders, Adoption, Parental Responsibility, Threshold Criteria, Welfare of the Child, Domestic Violence, Dispensing With Parental Consent
Family Law Child Protection Care Orders Placement Orders Adoption Parental Responsibility Threshold Criteria Welfare of the Child +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

X Local Authority

Applicant

Ms W

1st Respondent (mother)

B (child)

2nd Respondent (child)

A (child)

2nd Respondent (child)

Mrs G

Children’s Guardian

Mr M

Father of B (party, Not Present)

Mr A

Father of a (party, Not Present)

Procedural Posture

Care and Placement Order Application (family Proceedings) / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether threshold criteria under s.31 Children Act 1989 are met for care orders
  2. 2 Whether placement orders for adoption should be made for B and A
  3. 3 Whether parental consent to placement should be dispensed with under Adoption and Children Act 2002

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the threshold criteria for care orders were met due to the children suffering or being at risk of significant harm from exposure to domestic violence, neglect, and the mother's inability to protect them or work openly with professionals. The court determined that the mother could not safely parent the children within a timescale consistent with their welfare and that adoption was in their best interests. The court dispensed with the mother's consent to placement for adoption as required by the children's welfare.

Court Disposition

Care orders and placement orders made in respect of B and A; mother's consent to placement dispensed with.

Orders

  • Care orders in favour of the Council for B and A
  • Placement orders in favour of the Council for B and A