E (A Child), Re [2010] EWMC 56 (FPC) (2010)

E (A Child), Re [2010] EWMC 56 (FPC) (2010)

Making a Residence Order for E in favour of C and D is necessary and in E's best interest to formalise the grandparents' position, give them parental responsibility, and prevent disruption to his future.

Citation
[2010] EWMC 56 (FPC)
Parties
Applicant: X Local Authority; 1st Respondent: A; 2nd Respondent: B; 3rd Respondent: C; 4th Respondent: D
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Family Proceedings / Application for Residence Order and Interim Care Order
Outcome
Residence Order for E in favour of C and D; proceedings concerning F adjourned; Interim Care Order for F renewed until next hearing.
Legal Topics
Residence Order, Interim Care Order, Parental Responsibility, Welfare of the Child
Family Law Residence Order Interim Care Order Parental Responsibility Welfare of the Child

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

X Local Authority

Applicant

A

1st Respondent

B

2nd Respondent

C

3rd Respondent

D

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Proceedings / Application for Residence Order and Interim Care Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a Residence Order should be made in favour of C and D for E
  2. 2 Whether proceedings concerning F should be adjourned and an Interim Care Order made

Ratio Decidendi

Making a Residence Order for E in favour of C and D is necessary and in E's best interest to formalise the grandparents' position, give them parental responsibility, and prevent disruption to his future.

Court Disposition

Residence Order for E in favour of C and D; proceedings concerning F adjourned; Interim Care Order for F renewed until next hearing.

Orders

  • E is made subject of a Residence Order in favour of C and D
  • CMC concerning F adjourned until 13 August 2010