XK v JY
Although the mother established a grave risk of harm to ZK if returned to Slovakia due to allegations of domestic violence, the court found that the protective measures available in Slovakia, together with the undertakings offered by the father, were sufficient to mitigate that risk. Therefore, the Article 13(b)...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: XK; Respondent: JY
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Hague Convention Child Abduction Application / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for summary return granted
- Legal Topics
- International Child Abduction, Hague Convention 1980, Summary Return of Child, Article 13(b) Exception, Protective Measures, Habitual Residence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
XK
Applicant
JY
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Hague Convention Child Abduction Application / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the removal of ZK from Slovakia to England was wrongful under the Hague Convention 1980
- 2 Whether the Article 13(b) exception (grave risk of harm or intolerable situation) is established
- 3 Whether sufficient protective measures exist in Slovakia to mitigate any grave risk to the child
Ratio Decidendi
Although the mother established a grave risk of harm to ZK if returned to Slovakia due to allegations of domestic violence, the court found that the protective measures available in Slovakia, together with the undertakings offered by the father, were sufficient to mitigate that risk. Therefore, the Article 13(b) exception was not made out and the summary return of ZK to Slovakia was ordered.
Court Disposition
Application for summary return granted
Orders
- ZK to be returned to Slovakia forthwith with the mother accompanying him
- Father to provide undertakings including funding travel, not attending the airport, not supporting prosecution for wrongful removal, not removing ZK from the mother's care or school, vacating the former home or funding alternative accommodation, continuing financial support, and non-molestation undertakings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment