Mattioli v XY [2014] EWHC 269 (QB) (12 February 2014)
The court granted and continued the non-disclosure order, anonymised the Defendant, and restricted public access to the file because disclosure would risk identifying confidential information of a third party and defeat the purpose of the proceedings. The proceedings were stayed upon the Defendant's undertakings.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 269
- Parties
- Claimant: Ian Mattioli; Defendant: XY
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interim Application and Return Date Hearing
- Outcome
- Proceedings stayed upon undertakings by Defendant
- Legal Topics
- Non Disclosure Orders, Anonymity Orders, Open Justice Derogations, Confidential Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Mattioli
Claimant
XY
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Application and Return Date Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a non-disclosure order should be granted to protect confidential information
- 2 Whether the Defendant's identity should be anonymised to protect a third party
- 3 Whether proceedings should be stayed upon undertakings by the Defendant
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted and continued the non-disclosure order, anonymised the Defendant, and restricted public access to the file because disclosure would risk identifying confidential information of a third party and defeat the purpose of the proceedings. The proceedings were stayed upon the Defendant's undertakings.
Court Disposition
Proceedings stayed upon undertakings by Defendant
Orders
- Non-disclosure order continued
- Defendant anonymised as 'XY'
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment