Mattioli v XY [2014] EWHC 269 (QB) (12 February 2014)

Mattioli v XY [2014] EWHC 269 (QB) (12 February 2014)

The court granted and continued the non-disclosure order, anonymised the Defendant, and restricted public access to the file because disclosure would risk identifying confidential information of a third party and defeat the purpose of the proceedings. The proceedings were stayed upon the Defendant's undertakings.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 269
Parties
Claimant: Ian Mattioli; Defendant: XY
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 February 2014
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interim Application and Return Date Hearing
Outcome
Proceedings stayed upon undertakings by Defendant
Legal Topics
Non Disclosure Orders, Anonymity Orders, Open Justice Derogations, Confidential Information

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ian Mattioli

Claimant

XY

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interim Application and Return Date Hearing

  1. 1 Whether a non-disclosure order should be granted to protect confidential information
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant's identity should be anonymised to protect a third party
  3. 3 Whether proceedings should be stayed upon undertakings by the Defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted and continued the non-disclosure order, anonymised the Defendant, and restricted public access to the file because disclosure would risk identifying confidential information of a third party and defeat the purpose of the proceedings. The proceedings were stayed upon the Defendant's undertakings.

Court Disposition

Proceedings stayed upon undertakings by Defendant

Orders

  • Non-disclosure order continued
  • Defendant anonymised as 'XY'