XY v AB

XY v AB

The Employment Judge applied the correct legal principles, conducted a proper balancing exercise between open justice and privacy rights, and was entitled to grant a permanent anonymity order in favour of the Respondent given the unilateral withdrawal of allegations, ongoing breaches of reporting restrictions, and the absence of a determination on the merits. The decision was not plainly wrong nor outside the ambit of reasonable conclusions.

Parties
Appellant: XY; Respondent: AB
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Anonymity Orders, Open Justice, Sex Discrimination, Restricted Reporting Orders, Balancing Exercise, Privacy Rights
Employment Law Human Rights Anonymity Orders Open Justice Sex Discrimination Restricted Reporting Orders Balancing Exercise Privacy Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XY

Appellant

AB

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Judge erred in granting a permanent anonymity order in favour of the Respondent under Rule 50 of the Employment Tribunals (Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
  2. 2 Whether the Employment Judge failed to carry out a proper balancing exercise between open justice and privacy rights
  3. 3 Whether the Employment Judge placed excessive weight on the Respondent's privacy and insufficient weight on the principle of open justice

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Judge applied the correct legal principles, conducted a proper balancing exercise between open justice and privacy rights, and was entitled to grant a permanent anonymity order in favour of the Respondent given the unilateral withdrawal of allegations, ongoing breaches of reporting restrictions, and the absence of a determination on the merits. The decision was not plainly wrong nor outside the ambit of reasonable conclusions.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Permanent anonymity order in favour of the Respondent continues and applies to EAT proceedings.
  • Permanent anonymity order granted to the Appellant for reasons unrelated to the substance of the proceedings.