XZ v YZ

XZ v YZ

An interim reporting restriction order is justified to preserve the parties' positions and prevent potential prejudice until the court can conduct a full balancing exercise under Re S at the conclusion of the evidence.

Parties
Applicant: XZ; Respondent: YZ
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Application / Interlocutory Application for Reporting Restriction Order
Outcome
Interim reporting restriction order granted
Legal Topics
Reporting Restrictions, Open Justice, Anonymity in Court Proceedings, ECHR Article 8, ECHR Article 10
Family Law Media Law Reporting Restrictions Open Justice Anonymity in Court Proceedings ECHR Article 8 ECHR Article 10

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

XZ

Applicant

YZ

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Financial Remedy Application / Interlocutory Application for Reporting Restriction Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an interim reporting restriction order (RRO) should be granted in financial remedy proceedings
  2. 2 How to balance Article 8 ECHR privacy rights against Article 10 ECHR open justice rights

Ratio Decidendi

An interim reporting restriction order is justified to preserve the parties' positions and prevent potential prejudice until the court can conduct a full balancing exercise under Re S at the conclusion of the evidence.

Court Disposition

Interim reporting restriction order granted

Orders

  • Interim blanket reporting restriction order imposed until the application is considered substantively during final submissions
  • Counsel for the applicant to prepare an amended order expressly stating its interim nature and scope