Y v Z
The wife is permitted to formally plead conduct under s.25(2)(g) to ensure fairness to the husband, but is not prevented from running her case critical of the husband's behaviour, as her position has been clear throughout and the husband is not taken by surprise. The earlier recital does not bar her from advancing...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Y; Respondent: Z
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Financial Remedy Application / Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Financial Remedies, Pre Nuptial Agreements, Conduct Under Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 S.25(2)(g)
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Y
Applicant
Z
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Financial Remedy Application / Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the wife should be permitted to amend her case to rely on conduct under MCA 1973 s.25(2)(g)
- 2 Whether the wife is prevented from running a case critical of the husband's behaviour due to an earlier recital
- 3 Whether the husband's behaviour affects the computation of his entitlement under the PNA
Ratio Decidendi
The wife is permitted to formally plead conduct under s.25(2)(g) to ensure fairness to the husband, but is not prevented from running her case critical of the husband's behaviour, as her position has been clear throughout and the husband is not taken by surprise. The earlier recital does not bar her from advancing relevant arguments, and formal pleadings should be prepared to allow determination on either basis.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part
Orders
- The wife is permitted to formally plead conduct under s.25(2)(g)
- Formal conduct pleadings to be prepared
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment