R v Ying Zhang
Conviction not unsafe as tactical decisions by defence were justified and psychiatric evidence would not have afforded a defence; fresh evidence does not meet statutory criteria; adverse inference directions were appropriate; sentence was manifestly excessive due to guideline error and minimum term recalculated.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ying Zhang
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Attempted Murder, Adducing Fresh Evidence, Psychiatric Evidence, Intent, Adverse Inference, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ying Zhang
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Applications for Leave to Appeal Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether conviction is unsafe due to non-adduction of psychiatric evidence
- 2 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
- 3 Whether adverse inference directions were appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
Conviction not unsafe as tactical decisions by defence were justified and psychiatric evidence would not have afforded a defence; fresh evidence does not meet statutory criteria; adverse inference directions were appropriate; sentence was manifestly excessive due to guideline error and minimum term recalculated.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction refused; appeal against sentence allowed in part
Orders
- Application to adduce fresh evidence refused
- Renewed application for leave to appeal conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment