YP v XP
The mother failed to discharge the burden of proof for the Article 13b defence. The French courts have already determined the welfare issues, including allegations of abuse, and the English court should not review those findings. The risk of harm or intolerable situation on return is not established. The child must be returned to France.
- Parties
- Applicant: YP; Respondent: XP
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Hague Convention Child Abduction Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Return order granted
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Hague Convention, Custody, Habitual Residence, Summary Return, Article 13b Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
YP
Applicant
XP
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Hague Convention Child Abduction Application / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the child should be summarily returned to France under the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether Article 13b defence (grave risk of harm or intolerable situation) is established
- 3 Whether the child's objections to return should be considered
Ratio Decidendi
The mother failed to discharge the burden of proof for the Article 13b defence. The French courts have already determined the welfare issues, including allegations of abuse, and the English court should not review those findings. The risk of harm or intolerable situation on return is not established. The child must be returned to France.
Court Disposition
Return order granted
Orders
- The child is to be returned to France by 23:59 on 29th March 2022.
- The mother must indicate by 25th March 2022 whether she will accompany the child.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment