Klamer v Klamer

Klamer v Klamer

The application for permission to appeal was refused because there was no important point of law or practice, nor any other compelling reason to grant permission. The case did not meet the high threshold required for a second appeal under section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999.

Parties
Applicant: Yvette Klamer; Respondent: John Michael Klamer
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
02 May 2006
Procedural Posture
Appeal Family Law (ancillary Relief) / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Appeal)
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
Ancillary Relief, Division of Matrimonial Assets, Appeals Procedure, Short Marriage
Family Law Ancillary Relief Division of Matrimonial Assets Appeals Procedure Short Marriage

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yvette Klamer

Applicant

John Michael Klamer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Family Law (ancillary Relief) / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Appeal)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission for a second appeal should be granted under section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999
  2. 2 Whether the division of assets was unfair or raised an important point of law or practice

Ratio Decidendi

The application for permission to appeal was refused because there was no important point of law or practice, nor any other compelling reason to grant permission. The case did not meet the high threshold required for a second appeal under section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused