SA Builders And Contractors Ltd v Holm [2016] EWCA Civ 712 (16 June 2016)
There is a realistic prospect that the witness statements filed by the Claimant, though defective in form, purported to be a defence to the counterclaim and thus default judgment was arguably not appropriate under Practice Direction 12 and CPR 12.3(2)(b).
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 712
- Parties
- Claimant: SA Builders and Contractors Ltd; Defendant: Yvonne Holm
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted, conditional on satisfaction of interim cost orders.
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Defective Works, Counterclaim, Practice Direction 12, CPR 16.5
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SA Builders and Contractors Ltd
Claimant
Yvonne Holm
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a witness statement can constitute a defence to a counterclaim under CPR 12.3(2)(b) and Practice Direction 12
- 2 Whether judgment in default was properly granted on the counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
There is a realistic prospect that the witness statements filed by the Claimant, though defective in form, purported to be a defence to the counterclaim and thus default judgment was arguably not appropriate under Practice Direction 12 and CPR 12.3(2)(b).
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted, conditional on satisfaction of interim cost orders.
Orders
- Permission to appeal against the order dated 18 March 2015 (if it exists) and paragraph 1 of the order dated 23 March 2015.
- Permission conditional on payment of interim cost orders (£10,000 and £15,000).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment