Z v Y (Revocation of Adoption Order)
The application to revoke the adoption order is refused because, although the birth mother gave inaccurate information, there is insufficient evidence of fraud or a fundamental breach of natural justice to meet the high threshold for revocation. The local authority and court acted in good faith on the information available. The applicant's own delays and lack of action undermine his case. Revocation would cause significant harm to the child by undermining his secure placement and identity. Leave to apply for contact is refused as it would risk disrupting the child's life and welfare, and the adopters do not support direct contact at this stage.
- Parties
- Applicant: Z; 1st Respondent: A Local Authority; 2nd Respondent: Y; 3rd & 4th Respondents: Mr & Mrs A; 5th Respondent: X (A Child Through His Children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Applications refused
- Legal Topics
- Revocation of Adoption Order, Parental Responsibility, Contact With Adopted Child, Fraud and Natural Justice in Adoption
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Z
Applicant
A Local Authority
1st Respondent
Y
2nd Respondent
Mr & Mrs A
3rd & 4th Respondents
X (A Child Through His Children’s Guardian)
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the adoption order should be revoked under the inherent jurisdiction due to alleged fraud or breach of natural justice
- 2 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to apply for contact under s51A Adoption and Children Act 2002
Ratio Decidendi
The application to revoke the adoption order is refused because, although the birth mother gave inaccurate information, there is insufficient evidence of fraud or a fundamental breach of natural justice to meet the high threshold for revocation. The local authority and court acted in good faith on the information available. The applicant's own delays and lack of action undermine his case. Revocation would cause significant harm to the child by undermining his secure placement and identity. Leave to apply for contact is refused as it would risk disrupting the child's life and welfare, and the adopters do not support direct contact at this stage.
Court Disposition
Applications refused
Orders
- Application to revoke the adoption order is dismissed.
- Application for leave to apply for contact under s51A ACA 2002 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment