R v Zackery Griffiths

R v Zackery Griffiths

There was no error in principle or manifest excessiveness in the sentence imposed; mitigation was properly considered; the application disclosed no arguable grounds for appeal.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Zackery Griffiths
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeals
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Offences Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Zackery Griffiths

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's mitigation was properly considered
  3. 3 Whether there was unequal treatment in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

There was no error in principle or manifest excessiveness in the sentence imposed; mitigation was properly considered; the application disclosed no arguable grounds for appeal.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
  • Application for extension of time refused