Attorney General v Abiola [2006] EWHC 901 (Admin) (21 March 2006)
The defendant has habitually and persistently re-litigated matters conclusively determined against her, with duplicative and meritless claims and applications, constituting vexatious conduct under section 42. The statutory preconditions are satisfied and an unlimited civil proceedings order is warranted.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 901 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: HM Attorney General; Defendant: Zainab Duke Abiola
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Civil Proceedings Order Under Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 / Judgment on Application
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigation, Civil Proceedings Order, Section 42 Supreme Court Act 1981
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Attorney General
Claimant
Zainab Duke Abiola
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Civil Proceedings Order Under Section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981 / Judgment on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious civil proceedings or made vexatious applications without reasonable ground, justifying an order under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant has habitually and persistently re-litigated matters conclusively determined against her, with duplicative and meritless claims and applications, constituting vexatious conduct under section 42. The statutory preconditions are satisfied and an unlimited civil proceedings order is warranted.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Unlimited civil proceedings order made against the defendant under section 42 of the Supreme Court Act 1981, restraining her from instituting civil proceedings without leave of the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment