R v Zakariya Subeir
The appellant's role was significant, not lesser, and the judge's reduction of 12 months from the starting point appropriately reflected mitigation; the sentence imposed was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Zakariya Subeir
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Possession of Criminal Property, Appeals
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Zakariya Subeir
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Appropriate categorisation of the appellant's role in the drug supply operation under sentencing guidelines
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's role was significant, not lesser, and the judge's reduction of 12 months from the starting point appropriately reflected mitigation; the sentence imposed was neither manifestly excessive nor wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment