Davis, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 2424 (05 December 2013)
The applications for extension of time and leave to appeal are summarily refused as frivolous, vexatious, and unarguable; no competent lawyer could have reasonably believed the Refugee Convention defence applied to the facts.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Crim 2424
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Zantoe Davis; Applicant: Mercedes Thabangu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- applications summarily refused
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Advance Fee Fraud, Legal Aid Self Certification, Refugee Convention Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Zantoe Davis
Applicant
Mercedes Thabangu
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether applicants should be granted extension of time and leave to appeal against conviction based on alleged negligent advice regarding Refugee Convention defence
- 2 Whether the application constitutes an abuse of process
Ratio Decidendi
The applications for extension of time and leave to appeal are summarily refused as frivolous, vexatious, and unarguable; no competent lawyer could have reasonably believed the Refugee Convention defence applied to the facts.
Court Disposition
applications summarily refused
Orders
- Applications for extension of time and leave to appeal are refused.
- Matter referred to Solicitors Regulatory Authority for investigation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment