Zipher Ltd v Markem Systems Ltd & Anor
There was no more than an offer by Zipher of an undertaking to the High Court, which was not accepted or recorded as binding. The offer lapsed when Judge Fysh awarded claims 1 to 4 to Markem and did not revive upon appeal. Therefore, Zipher was not bound by any undertaking not to enforce claims wider than claim 5.
- Parties
- Appellant: Zipher Limited; Respondent: Markem Systems Limited; Respondent: Markem Technologies Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (patents Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Patents, Undertakings to Court, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zipher Limited
Appellant
Markem Systems Limited
Respondent
Markem Technologies Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (patents Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Zipher was bound by an undertaking given to the High Court not to enforce patent claims wider than claim 5
- 2 Whether an oral offer of an undertaking, not recorded in writing or accepted by the court, is binding and enforceable
- 3 Whether such an undertaking, if it existed, revived upon appeal
Ratio Decidendi
There was no more than an offer by Zipher of an undertaking to the High Court, which was not accepted or recorded as binding. The offer lapsed when Judge Fysh awarded claims 1 to 4 to Markem and did not revive upon appeal. Therefore, Zipher was not bound by any undertaking not to enforce claims wider than claim 5.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; Zipher is not bound by any undertaking not to enforce claims wider than claim 5.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment