Binstead & Anor v Zytronic Displays Ltd

Binstead & Anor v Zytronic Displays Ltd

The application for preliminary issues to be tried at a preliminary trial was refused because the proposed issues were not likely to dispose of the case or significantly reduce costs or time, involved disputed facts unsuitable for preliminary determination, and would likely increase costs and delay. The court emphasized the need for caution in ordering preliminary issues and found that the circumstances did not justify such an order.

Parties
Claimant/part 20 Defendant: Ronald Peter Binstead; Claimant/part 20 Defendant: Binstead Designs Limited; Defendant: Zytronic Displays Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Civil (intellectual Property, Patents) / Application for Preliminary Issues to Be Tried at a Preliminary Trial; Case Management Conference
Outcome
Application for preliminary issues refused; Defendant awarded costs of the application.
Legal Topics
Preliminary Issues, Case Management, Patent Infringement, Breach of Confidence, Breach of Contract
Intellectual Property Patents Civil Procedure Preliminary Issues Case Management Patent Infringement Breach of Confidence Breach of Contract

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ronald Peter Binstead

Claimant/part 20 Defendant

Binstead Designs Limited

Claimant/part 20 Defendant

Zytronic Displays Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil (intellectual Property, Patents) / Application for Preliminary Issues to Be Tried at a Preliminary Trial; Case Management Conference

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether certain issues should be determined as preliminary issues at a preliminary trial
  2. 2 Whether determination of preliminary issues would dispose of the case or aspects of it
  3. 3 Whether preliminary issues would reduce costs and time

Ratio Decidendi

The application for preliminary issues to be tried at a preliminary trial was refused because the proposed issues were not likely to dispose of the case or significantly reduce costs or time, involved disputed facts unsuitable for preliminary determination, and would likely increase costs and delay. The court emphasized the need for caution in ordering preliminary issues and found that the circumstances did not justify such an order.

Court Disposition

Application for preliminary issues refused; Defendant awarded costs of the application.

Orders

  • Claimants' application for preliminary issues is dismissed.
  • Defendant awarded its costs of the application, with half the costs of the preparation of Mr. Festing’s witness statement disallowed.