Board Of Governors, Achimota School Vrs Nii Ako Nortei Ii Sued As “mankralo Or Acting Chief Of Osu Of Division Of Ga State and Others [2020] GHASC 20 (20 May 2020)
The Supreme Court (majority) held that the Board of Governors of Achimota School has capacity to sue, as accrued rights and capacity under CAP 114 were not extinguished by subsequent repeals, and the legislative intent and practice support the continued existence of such boards. The plaintiff was not a party or privy to the earlier suit, was not notified, and fraud was sufficiently pleaded. The doctrines of res judicata and abuse of process do not bar the suit. The Court of Appeal's decision was set aside, and the matter remitted to the High Court for trial on the merits. (Dissent: The plaintiff lacked capacity as no statutory basis exists under current law, and the suit is a nullity.)
- Citation
- [2020] GHASC 20
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent/appellant: Board of Governors, Achimota School; 1st Defendant/appellant/respondent: Nii Ako Nortei II (sued as Mankralo or Acting Chief of Osu of Division of Ga State); 2nd Defendant: Platinum Equities Limited; 3rd Defendant/respondent/respondent: Lands Commission
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed (majority); Court of Appeal judgment set aside; case remitted to High Court for trial on merits. (Dissent: Appeal dismissed for want of capacity.)
- Legal Topics
- Capacity to Sue, Res Judicata, Abuse of Process, Fraud in Obtaining Judgment, Interpretation of Statutes, Joinder of Parties, Effect of Repealed Statutes, Standing/locus Standi
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Board of Governors, Achimota School
Plaintiff/respondent/appellant
Nii Ako Nortei II (sued as Mankralo or Acting Chief of Osu of Division of Ga State)
1st Defendant/appellant/respondent
Platinum Equities Limited
2nd Defendant
Lands Commission
3rd Defendant/respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment on Appeal From Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Board of Governors of Achimota School has capacity to sue after repeal of its enabling statute
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is bound by previous judgments as a privy of the Lands Commission or Attorney-General
- 3 Whether the doctrine of res judicata or abuse of process bars the plaintiff's suit
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court (majority) held that the Board of Governors of Achimota School has capacity to sue, as accrued rights and capacity under CAP 114 were not extinguished by subsequent repeals, and the legislative intent and practice support the continued existence of such boards. The plaintiff was not a party or privy to the earlier suit, was not notified, and fraud was sufficiently pleaded. The doctrines of res judicata and abuse of process do not bar the suit. The Court of Appeal's decision was set aside, and the matter remitted to the High Court for trial on the merits. (Dissent: The plaintiff lacked capacity as no statutory basis exists under current law, and the suit is a nullity.)
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed (majority); Court of Appeal judgment set aside; case remitted to High Court for trial on merits. (Dissent: Appeal dismissed for want of capacity.)
Orders
- Court of Appeal judgment dated 2nd November 2017 set aside
- Suit No. LD/0352/2016 to proceed in the High Court, Accra pursuant to the Ruling of Judge No. 4 dated 20th July 2016
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment