REPUBLIC VRS AMPAH (B3/15/22) [2024] GHADC 118 (26 February 2024)
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused harm as defined under section 69 of Act 29, but the evidence established that the accused unlawfully assaulted the complainant by hitting him with a stick, warranting conviction for assault as a lesser offence under section 84 of Act 29 and section 154(2) of Act 30.
- Citation
- REPUBLIC VRS AMPAH (B3/15/22) [2024] GHADC 118 (26 February 2024)
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: Samuel Ampah
- Court
- ghadc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Conviction for assault; acquittal on causing harm
- Legal Topics
- Causing Harm, Assault, Burden of Proof, Lesser Included Offence
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Republic
Prosecution
Samuel Ampah
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the accused intentionally and unlawfully caused harm to the complainant under section 69 of Act 29
- 2 Whether the facts support a conviction for assault as a lesser offence
Ratio Decidendi
The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused caused harm as defined under section 69 of Act 29, but the evidence established that the accused unlawfully assaulted the complainant by hitting him with a stick, warranting conviction for assault as a lesser offence under section 84 of Act 29 and section 154(2) of Act 30.
Court Disposition
Conviction for assault; acquittal on causing harm
Orders
- Accused sentenced to 200 penalty units or in default eight (8) months imprisonment
- Accused to sign a bond to be of good behaviour for twelve (12) months
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment