Anane Vrs Agyemang and Others [2014] GHASC 126 (26 February 2014)
The lease acquired by Osei Hwirie as customary successor was held in trust for the family and retained its family character. The Supreme Court departed from previous law, holding that adoption of proceedings after transfer is at the discretion of the new judge, not subject to parties’ consent. The Respondent had capacity to sue to protect family property. The appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2014] GHASC 126
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: Adomako Anane; Defendant/respondent/appellant: Nana Owusu Agyemang (substituted by Nana Banahene); Defendant/respondent/appellant: Nana Yaw Guakro (substituted by Nana Asamoah Okyere); Defendant/respondent/appellant: Jerry Dee Amoah; Defendant/respondent/appellant: Akwasi Donkor (substituted by Nana Kwaku Dwomoh); Defendant/respondent/appellant: Addo Aliaja; Defendant/respondent/appellant: Amma Kwaah (substituted by Nana Kwaku Dwomoh); Defendant/respondent/appellant: Kwabena Antoh (substituted by Akua Ode); Defendant/respondent/appellant: Amma Nhyiraa
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 26 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Family Property, Fiduciary Duty, Adoption of Proceedings, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adomako Anane
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Nana Owusu Agyemang (substituted by Nana Banahene)
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Nana Yaw Guakro (substituted by Nana Asamoah Okyere)
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Jerry Dee Amoah
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Akwasi Donkor (substituted by Nana Kwaku Dwomoh)
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Addo Aliaja
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Amma Kwaah (substituted by Nana Kwaku Dwomoh)
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Kwabena Antoh (substituted by Akua Ode)
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Amma Nhyiraa
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the lease acquired by Osei Hwirie was family property or self-acquired property
- 2 Whether the proceedings before the previous judge could be adopted without consent of all parties
- 3 Whether the Respondent had capacity to sue on behalf of the family
Ratio Decidendi
The lease acquired by Osei Hwirie as customary successor was held in trust for the family and retained its family character. The Supreme Court departed from previous law, holding that adoption of proceedings after transfer is at the discretion of the new judge, not subject to parties’ consent. The Respondent had capacity to sue to protect family property. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal affirmed
- Respondent’s cross-appeal for variation of costs and order of accounts declined
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment