REPUBLIC VRS. BOTWEY (D10//40/23) [2025] GHACC 19 (8 April 2025)

REPUBLIC VRS. BOTWEY (D10//40/23) [2025] GHACC 19 (8 April 2025)

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had carnal knowledge or unnatural carnal knowledge of the victim, as there was no evidence of penetration or ejaculation. However, the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused indecently assaulted the victim, a mental patient incapable of valid consent, by making sexual bodily contact, including kissing, fondling, and having the victim masturbate him. The accused's knowledge of the victim's mental incapacity was established by their cohabitation and uncontradicted medical evidence.

Citation
[2025] GHACC 19
Parties
Prosecution: The Republic; Accused: David Botwey
Court
Circuit Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
8 April 2025
Case Number
D10//40/23
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Judgment
Outcome
Acquitted on count of carnal knowledge; convicted on count of indecent assault; sentenced to three years imprisonment with hard labour.
Legal Topics
Indecent Assault, Carnal Knowledge, Mental Capacity, Burden of Proof, Sentencing
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Mental Health Law Indecent Assault Carnal Knowledge Mental Capacity Burden of Proof Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Republic

Prosecution

David Botwey

Accused

Procedural Posture

Criminal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the accused had carnal knowledge of a mental patient under the care of a mental hospital
  2. 2 Whether the accused committed indecent assault on a mental patient incapable of consenting

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had carnal knowledge or unnatural carnal knowledge of the victim, as there was no evidence of penetration or ejaculation. However, the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused indecently assaulted the victim, a mental patient incapable of valid consent, by making sexual bodily contact, including kissing, fondling, and having the victim masturbate him. The accused's knowledge of the victim's mental incapacity was established by their cohabitation and uncontradicted medical evidence.

Court Disposition

Acquitted on count of carnal knowledge; convicted on count of indecent assault; sentenced to three years imprisonment with hard labour.

Orders

  • Psychological counselling recommended for the victim.
  • Bench warrant and warrant of commitment for arrest of convict; sentence to commence on date of arrest.