THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF EBENEZER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL VRS ATTORNEY GENERAL & ANOR. (LD/0046/2024) [2024] GHAHC 200 (27 March 2024)

THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF EBENEZER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL VRS ATTORNEY GENERAL & ANOR. (LD/0046/2024) [2024] GHAHC 200 (27 March 2024)

The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a greater hardship on the balance of convenience, and the land is State land required for a public project; thus, an injunction against the Government is not justified at this stage.

Citation
THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF EBENEZER SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL VRS ATTORNEY GENERAL & ANOR. (LD/0046/2024) [2024] GHAHC 200 (27 March 2024)
Parties
Plaintiff/applicant: The Board of Governors of Ebenezer Senior High School; Defendant/respondent: Attorney General; Defendant/respondent: The Municipal Chief Executive of Ablekuma West Municipal Assembly
Court
ghahc
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
27 March 2024
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunction, Adverse Possession, State Lands, Balance of Convenience
Source Language
eng

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Board of Governors of Ebenezer Senior High School

Plaintiff/applicant

Attorney General

Defendant/respondent

The Municipal Chief Executive of Ablekuma West Municipal Assembly

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to an interlocutory injunction restraining the Defendants from interfering with the subject land pending determination of the suit
  2. 2 Whether adverse possession can be exercised over State land

Ratio Decidendi

The Plaintiff failed to demonstrate a greater hardship on the balance of convenience, and the land is State land required for a public project; thus, an injunction against the Government is not justified at this stage.

Court Disposition

Application for interlocutory injunction dismissed