Bobie Vrs 21st Century Construction Co Ltd and Others [2016] GHASC 72 (9 March 2016)
Plaintiff failed to prove fraud as required by law; the orders expunging his registration were not obtained by fraud, and procedural errors or lack of notice did not entitle him to a fresh action to set aside the orders. The High Court lacked jurisdiction to set aside the orders on grounds other than fraud.
- Citation
- [2016] GHASC 72
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant/appellant: John Kwadwo Bobie; Defendant/respondent/respondent: 21st Century Construction Co. Ltd a.k.a 21st Century Real Estate Ltd; Defendant/respondent/respondent: Obaa Ahema Enterprises Ltd; Defendant/respondent/respondent: Adom Spinning Co. Ltd; Defendant/respondent/respondent: Gelina Packaging Co. Ltd; Defendant/respondent/respondent: Gelina Tropical Co. Ltd; Defendant/respondent/respondent: Kofi Asmah; Defendant/respondent/respondent: The Regional Lands Officer, Lands Commission, Central Region, Cape Coast; Defendant/respondent/respondent: 21st Century Construction Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 9 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Mandamus, Fraud on Judgment, Natural Justice, Land Registration
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Kwadwo Bobie
Plaintiff/appellant/appellant
21st Century Construction Co. Ltd a.k.a 21st Century Real Estate Ltd
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Obaa Ahema Enterprises Ltd
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Adom Spinning Co. Ltd
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Gelina Packaging Co. Ltd
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Gelina Tropical Co. Ltd
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Kofi Asmah
Defendant/respondent/respondent
The Regional Lands Officer, Lands Commission, Central Region, Cape Coast
Defendant/respondent/respondent
21st Century Construction Ltd
Defendant/respondent/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the orders expunging plaintiff's land registration were procured by fraud
- 2 Whether orders made without notice to the plaintiff are null and void
- 3 Whether the High Court had jurisdiction to set aside orders on grounds other than fraud
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to prove fraud as required by law; the orders expunging his registration were not obtained by fraud, and procedural errors or lack of notice did not entitle him to a fresh action to set aside the orders. The High Court lacked jurisdiction to set aside the orders on grounds other than fraud.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment