Affram & Anor Vrs Owusu-twumasi & 2 Ors [2023] GHASC 6 (15 February 2023)
1st Plaintiff is the beneficial owner of 43% shares in 2nd and 3rd Defendant companies, held on constructive trust by 1st Defendant. Transfer of shares without consent is void in equity. Reliefs for declaration of void share transfers affecting third parties are refused. 2nd Plaintiff's claim fails as he voluntarily relinquished shares and directorship. Valuation report tendered by 1st Plaintiff is rejected as self-serving; independent valuation ordered. Orders for accounts and registration of shares in 1st Plaintiff's name granted.
- Citation
- Affram & Anor Vrs Owusu-twumasi & 2 Ors [2023] GHASC 6 (15 February 2023)
- Parties
- 1st Plaintiff/respondent/appellant: Edem Affram; 2nd Plaintiff/respondent/appellant: Nana Obuor Nimako; 1st Defendant/appellant/respondent: Bernard Yaw Owusu-Twumasi; 2nd Defendant/appellant/respondent: Oak House Company Ltd; 3rd Defendant/respondent: Oak House Group Ltd.
- Court
- ghasc
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 15 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal by 1st Plaintiff allowed in part; appeal by 2nd Plaintiff dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Shareholder Rights, Constructive Trust, Fraud, Directorship, Transfer of Shares, Valuation of Land, Estoppel, Pleadings, Burden of Proof
- Source Language
- eng
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edem Affram
1st Plaintiff/respondent/appellant
Nana Obuor Nimako
2nd Plaintiff/respondent/appellant
Bernard Yaw Owusu-Twumasi
1st Defendant/appellant/respondent
Oak House Company Ltd
2nd Defendant/appellant/respondent
Oak House Group Ltd.
3rd Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Final Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 1st Plaintiff remains a shareholder and director of 2nd Defendant Company
- 2 Whether the transfer of shares from 1st Plaintiff to 1st Defendant was fraudulent or void
- 3 Whether 2nd Plaintiff was coerced to relinquish his shares and directorship
Ratio Decidendi
1st Plaintiff is the beneficial owner of 43% shares in 2nd and 3rd Defendant companies, held on constructive trust by 1st Defendant. Transfer of shares without consent is void in equity. Reliefs for declaration of void share transfers affecting third parties are refused. 2nd Plaintiff's claim fails as he voluntarily relinquished shares and directorship. Valuation report tendered by 1st Plaintiff is rejected as self-serving; independent valuation ordered. Orders for accounts and registration of shares in 1st Plaintiff's name granted.
Court Disposition
Appeal by 1st Plaintiff allowed in part; appeal by 2nd Plaintiff dismissed.
Orders
- 1st Defendant to execute deeds of transfer for 43% shares in 2nd and 3rd Defendant companies in favour of 1st Plaintiff.
- 2nd and 3rd Defendant companies to register 1st Plaintiff as holder of 43% shares.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment