Obeng and Another Vrs Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (kma) and Another [2017] GHASC 20 (14 June 2017)
The Plaintiffs failed to comply with the mandatory statutory notice requirements under section 127 of the Local Government Act, 1993 (Act 462), as the notice did not specify the names, place of abode, or explicit reliefs sought. This non-compliance is fatal to the action and deprives the court of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeal erred in holding otherwise, and the High Court’s decision to set aside the writ is restored.
- Citation
- [2017] GHASC 20
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: Kwabena Obeng (for himself and on behalf of Kejetia Traders Association); Plaintiff/appellant/respondent: Eric Akwasi Prempeh (for himself and on behalf of Kejetia Petty Traders Association); Defendant/respondent/appellant: Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (KMA); Defendant/respondent/appellant: Kojo Bonsu
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment (supreme Court)
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; suit set aside for want of statutory compliance
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Notice Requirements, Jurisdiction, Compensation for Compulsory Acquisition, Procedural Compliance
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kwabena Obeng (for himself and on behalf of Kejetia Traders Association)
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Eric Akwasi Prempeh (for himself and on behalf of Kejetia Petty Traders Association)
Plaintiff/appellant/respondent
Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (KMA)
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Kojo Bonsu
Defendant/respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment (supreme Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Plaintiffs complied with the statutory notice requirements under section 127 of the Local Government Act, 1993 (Act 462) before commencing suit against the Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly.
- 2 Whether failure to comply with section 127 of Act 462 is fatal to the Plaintiffs’ action.
- 3 Whether the procedure for compensation under section 56 of Act 462 is mandatory or discretionary.
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiffs failed to comply with the mandatory statutory notice requirements under section 127 of the Local Government Act, 1993 (Act 462), as the notice did not specify the names, place of abode, or explicit reliefs sought. This non-compliance is fatal to the action and deprives the court of jurisdiction. The Court of Appeal erred in holding otherwise, and the High Court’s decision to set aside the writ is restored.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; suit set aside for want of statutory compliance
Orders
- Judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 19th November 2015 set aside.
- Judgment of the High Court dated 27th July 2015 restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment