Mohammed Vrs Agyam [2023] GHADC 437 (28 June 2023)

Mohammed Vrs Agyam [2023] GHADC 437 (28 June 2023)

The defendant’s family holds a valid usufructuary interest in the land granted by the plaintiff’s family, which is inheritable and cannot be unilaterally terminated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s claim for recovery, damages, and injunction fails as the defendant is not a trespasser but a lawful holder of a possessory right.

Citation
[2023] GHADC 437
Parties
Plaintiff: Abdulai Mohammed; Defendant: Balimor Agyam
Court
District Court
Jurisdiction
Ghana
Judgment Date
28 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Land Dispute / Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff’s suit dismissed except for declaration that title remains with plaintiff’s family; no costs awarded.
Legal Topics
Usufructuary Interest, Customary Land Grant, Title to Land, Recovery of Possession, Trespass, Injunction
Source Language
English
Land Law Customary Law Usufructuary Interest Customary Land Grant Title to Land Recovery of Possession Trespass Injunction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Abdulai Mohammed

Plaintiff

Balimor Agyam

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Land Dispute / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether plaintiff is claiming defendant’s farmland granted by plaintiff’s family or a portion of late Limpo Damko Issahaku’s farmland given to defendant
  2. 2 Whether or not defendant has any interest in his father’s farmland
  3. 3 Whether or not the plaintiff can terminate the defendant’s interest in defendant’s family farmland, if any

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant’s family holds a valid usufructuary interest in the land granted by the plaintiff’s family, which is inheritable and cannot be unilaterally terminated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s claim for recovery, damages, and injunction fails as the defendant is not a trespasser but a lawful holder of a possessory right.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff’s suit dismissed except for declaration that title remains with plaintiff’s family; no costs awarded.

Orders

  • Plaintiff’s claims for recovery of possession, damages for trespass, and injunction are dismissed.
  • Title in the disputed land remains in the plaintiff’s family.