Ramadan and Another Vrs Electoral Commission and Others [2014] GHASC 161 (30 July 2014)
Regulation 1(3)(d) of C.I. 72, which allows the use of the NHI card for voter registration, is inconsistent with Article 42 of the Constitution because the NHI card does not establish Ghanaian citizenship, a constitutional requirement for voter registration. The use of an 'existing voter identification card' is permissible as it contains information on age and citizenship, thus meeting constitutional requirements.
- Citation
- [2014] GHASC 161
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Abu Ramadan; Plaintiff: Evans Nimako; Plaintiff: Kwasi Danso Acheampong; Defendant: Electoral Commission; Defendant: Attorney General
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Jurisdiction
- Ghana
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Judgment After Consolidated Hearing
- Outcome
- Principal reliefs granted in favour of Plaintiffs; Regulation 1(3)(d) of C.I. 72 declared void to the extent of inconsistency with Article 42; perpetual injunction issued against use of NHI card for voter registration.
- Legal Topics
- Voter Registration, Proof of Citizenship, Judicial Review, Interpretation of Constitution, Electoral Process
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Abu Ramadan
Plaintiff
Evans Nimako
Plaintiff
Kwasi Danso Acheampong
Plaintiff
Electoral Commission
Defendant
Attorney General
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Judgment After Consolidated Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the use of the National Health Insurance (NHI) Card as proof of qualification to register as a voter is inconsistent with Article 42 of the 1992 Constitution
- 2 Whether the use of an 'existing voter identification card' as proof of qualification to register as a voter is unconstitutional
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 1(3)(d) of C.I. 72, which allows the use of the NHI card for voter registration, is inconsistent with Article 42 of the Constitution because the NHI card does not establish Ghanaian citizenship, a constitutional requirement for voter registration. The use of an 'existing voter identification card' is permissible as it contains information on age and citizenship, thus meeting constitutional requirements.
Court Disposition
Principal reliefs granted in favour of Plaintiffs; Regulation 1(3)(d) of C.I. 72 declared void to the extent of inconsistency with Article 42; perpetual injunction issued against use of NHI card for voter registration.
Orders
- Declaration that use of NHI card for voter registration is unconstitutional and void
- Perpetual injunction restraining Electoral Commission from using NHI card for voter registration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment